« »

Native Values: Teaching the Sins of our Forefathers

Teachers are supposed to be saints, but in the three short years I’ve been a professor, I’ve sinned plenty. Not caring enough, seeking revenge for shoddy work and showing preferential treatment are a few of my common transgressions. Though admitting that might call my values into question, it doesn’t challenge my humanity. Rather, I make those mistakes because I am human. All higher education warriors—whether adjunct or tenured, first semester or fortieth, community college or Ivy League—will admit to this humanity, albeit behind closed doors. Also telling is that I try not to do those things, but some days I am more human than others.

There are other transgressions, less humane and less justifiable, that we do not admit to. No, I’m not talking about anything like that. I refer to the battleground of curriculum and lesson planning, that sacred, yet bloody field where we determine the destiny of our classrooms. We strive for the justice of all, many times massacring the fate of the course itself.

But these decisions have to be made. As an adjunct teaching American Literature, the process isn’t all that mysterious: the textbook is God, followed closely by the fact that it’s a survey course. You can almost boil it down to a formula. How many texts can I manage to talk about in the allotted time given? Of those texts, how many am I familiar enough with to talk about? Divide that number by the number of class meetings and voila! Magically, I have my syllabus.

Because I’m primarily a writing teacher, which means I devote about a third of any class I teach to the instruction of writing essays, the planning is a bit more complicated than that. Because my teaching philosophy is student-centric, I also try to build in “creative” class sessions, a well-meaning but ultimately fruitless accounting for those students in the class who will have absolutely no interest in anything they read, much less anything I say—a small group here, a scavenger hunt there, a few multicultural lesson plans for bonus. Still, I’m constrained by reality. There just isn’t that much time.

This semester is my second pass at teaching American Literature I—from Columbus to the Civil War. That particular constraint is the one that demands the most fear. Before teaching this class, I’d likely never spoken the phrase “before 1865.” A year ago, my first time, I had neither the experience nor the time to adequately plan a multifarious curriculum. My planning was more like crash-coursing; the entire weekend was spent surrounded in bed with books I hadn’t opened since college. This semester, however, I already had a syllabus to play with, and I had enough knowledge to know that cramming in as many authors as possible is boring, particularly when the majority of them are—sorry, I have to say it—dead white men.

Of particular concern to me this time around was diversity inclusion scholarship. I’d spent some time researching it out of personal interest and was also planning diversity as a “theme” in another course at the same school. It seemed an easy enough tweak: Focus on the way Americans have always treated “the Other,” also known as the cruel reality of “The American Dream” gone bad.  Or as one literary scholar put it, “the ‘melting pot’ is a crock.”1 As part of my new approach, I determined to spend more time on Native Americans.  Maybe even a whole week!

Through this Native American “unit,” which—by dictation of the chronological textbook—came at the beginning of the semester, we focused on the very important difference that Native American literature follows an oral tradition. What this means for the modern passing-through student and the adjunct who relies on a textbook, both for cost and simplicity reasons, is that there’s a practical reason we don’t study more Native American literature—it isn’t written down. In fact, out of the entire 2,310 page textbook, there are fewer than 10 pages containing Native American text. Compare this to Ben Franklin’s 42, or Hawthorn’s 71, or even Emily Dickinson, who at least had the compulsion to write things down, despite balking the convention of publishing. She gets 31 pages.

Who is to say what should and shouldn’t be taught? Any survey course, especially one that spans 200 years, offers very little autonomy for an adjunct professor. The textbook is King, the course outcomes my map, and I, a mere explorer, trying only to avoid another botched assignment, which mostly involves just staying alive.

Then why do I feel like I’m failing?

There’s an underlying moral here, and I’ve been struggling to figure it out. Too simplistic or fatalistic is the view that anyone who is different doesn’t make the cut. Sure, the canon is alive and well, but there are enough variances in the textbook that the publisher’s ass (along with my own) is pretty well covered. Still, I’m uncomfortable with all the usual excuses. I’m just an adjunct; how much research do they expect me to do? The students could care less about the ethics behind text choice; they just want to pass the class. And, perhaps the most frightening as long as I keep referring back to the Native Americans at various intervals, I AM teaching, if not them, than at least their culture. The truth behind those statements isn’t the point. They don’t reflect my values, which include eccentric expectations like social responsibility and personal accountability.

When it comes to course design, from daily instruction to out-of-the-classroom assignments to the presentation of my teaching persona, I’m given more decision making power than any Native American had over their moral fate in colonial times. Their biggest obstacle was not being a part of the discourse taking place with those in power, except through subversion or violence. The foe I must overcome is much greater: A primal, priapic cowardice exists within me. I’m innately uncomfortable in dealing with the Other.

To address this, I need to stop confusing my own lack of interest with a lack of resources; my ineffectuality at choosing good texts with my reliance on an incomplete textbook; my weakness at being diligent with my frustration at the faults of an entire educational system. Sure, the world is a complicated mess, ethically speaking. Since when did that keep me from doing the right thing?

As an American, it’s my moral duty to fight like Hell until any weakness within the ranks is gone. I’ve never been much of a patriot, but I’ll allow that America was founded on fortitude. Thankfully, I don’t have to agree with the philosophies of our founding fathers to learn something from them. Notably, it takes some time to bring about change. More importantly, as a literature teacher who still believes in the authority of the text, I’m able to interpret our literary past with a heavy dose of subjectivity, something I can put to good use in a class like this one. As my knowledge about American literature expands, which invariably begets renewed fervor in American history, my ability to talk about, explain and defend the literary traditions of the first, authentic Americans will also rise. With knowledge comes power, and, although sainthood requires a humility I’ll probably never have, power—as history often shows—can institute atonement.

Two thoughts: there is no liberation that only knows how to say “I’; there is no collective movement that speaks for each of us all the way through.  –Adrienne Rich

1Jay, Gregory S. “The End of “American” Literature: Toward a Multicultural Practice.” College English. 53.3 (1991): 264-81. Print.

11 responses to “Native Values: Teaching the Sins of our Forefathers”

  1. Jason Jason says:

    Whether your students understand it now, or later, or never, they will all be better off for having taken a class with you, a class that despite time constraints I know you imbue with what you live your life by: exploration, commitment to living, responsibility, and the search for betterment. Thank you so much for sharing this, lee lee.

    • llxt llxt says:

      Thanks Father Jason. I fully consider you one of the founding fathers of lee lee nation, and, as such, a primary influence in the values I'm passing along. 🙂

  2. Avatar Sally Harrison says:

    I loved reading this, Lee Lee! It was lots of fun, and also gave me some insight into your teaching. It's important to be true to yourself in life, once you figure out what that means. As a teacher, however, it's even more critical. It sounds like you're doing a fabulous job.
    Sally H

  3. Owen Owen says:

    Really great piece. Teaching can be as much a learning process for the teacher as it is for the students!

    • llxt llxt says:

      Thanks for reading, Owen. I sometimes wonder if I don't make teaching "harder than it really is" just so I can keep learning (read: don't get bored). 🙂

  4. Avatar Annie McQuilken says:

    A dilemma though…as your students future success may hinge on being familiar with the prevailing culture — as flawed and narrow as that culture may be — is it a disservice to your students to spend a week on something no one in our culture expects them to know (such as Native American oral traditions), when you could be spending a week on Twain or Emerson? And so the culture gets perpetuated on and on. I'm all in favor of diversifying the curriculum, as I think it makes for a better society. But the student in front of me may pay a short-term price for that global vision. Is teaching in service of society or in service of the individual students, and are those goals in conflict? I don't know, but I'm just thinking…

    • llxt llxt says:

      It's a good question and one I think of a lot. Unfortunately, I'm not sure there's "an answer"! However, I do view teaching at a community college as a pretty clear "service of Society" gig. Just not in the way you mean it…

  5. Avatar disperse says:

    I think this is the correct approach to a survey class. You can’t expect to divide your time among dozens of authors and have the students retain information about every work beyond “Emerson, oh yeah, I read some of that.” Instead pick one topic you are passionate about and connect everything you teach back to it. If you can pass on a fraction of that enthusiasm to your students you’ve succeeded. I know you care and that is why it is hard, it is also what makes you a great teacher.

  6. Avatar The Tailor says:

    There's really no other choice with a survey course, Mark's right. Also, there's nothing wrong with preferential treatment toward the students who give a crap

  7. hi, exalted blog on lardy loss. suchlike helped.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

« »
RSS | Contact | Contribute | Login
llxtm About llxtm

LLXTM is the Head Dreamer of this publication and various other projects, including Needle-Movers.com, The Perpetual You, and Ladymade. She has no spare time and yet eeks out moments to spend with her two {human} boys and two {puppy} boys. She can’t wait for spring, aka Covid Gardening, Part II. Follow her @wordsbyleelee on Instagram, or find her on her front porch in Hamden, CT.

Read more by this author on 30POV
...or elsewhere on the web.


October 2011
Kiss & Tell
July 2011
May 2011
2011 Best Of